Comparison of Communism vs. LDS United Order

Comparison of Communism vs. LDS United Order

(Generated by ChatGPT 2025)

 

  1. Latter-day Saint Economic Systems:
  2. United Order (Law of Consecration):
  • Voluntary covenant to consecrate all time, talents, and property to the Church.
  • Members deeded their property to the bishop, who returned a “stewardship” portion to manage.
  • Surplus was redistributed for the poor and common welfare.
  • Practiced in Kirtland, Missouri, Utah in the 1830s–1880s, though not universally successful.
  1. Zion’s Cooperative Mercantile Institution (ZCMI) & Other Co-ops:
  • LDS-sponsored private enterprises to avoid dependence on non-Mormon merchants.
  • Profits were shared, and community participation was encouraged.
  • Operated within capitalist frameworks, not by state control.
  1. Communism: Core Features
  • Abolishes private property: The state owns means of production.
  • State control over economy, production, wages.
  • Compulsory participation; dissent discouraged or punished.
  • Class warfare leads to a classless society.
  • Aims to eliminate religion as a tool of oppression (per Marx: “opiate of the masses”).

 

Conclusion:

The LDS United Order and ZCMI-style cooperatives were private, religious, and voluntary efforts to care for the poor and promote unity, not government-run economic systems. They share some surface similarities to communism (like redistribution), but differ radically in philosophy, methods, and outcomes.

  • LDS economics are rooted in agency, stewardship, and religious purpose.
  • Communism is based on material equality and compulsory control.

 

Key Differences

Principle LDS United Order / ZCMI Communism
Voluntariness Fully voluntary, covenant-based Mandatory, imposed by revolution/state
Private Property Stewardship model – property returned Abolished; state ownership
Religious Foundation Deeply spiritual and covenantal Atheistic or anti-religious
Economic Control Local bishops and private institutions Centralized by government
Individual Incentive Stewardship respected; surpluses shared Often suppressed
Social Class View Seeks unity and care, not class warfare Based on class struggle
Spiritual Motivation Charity, consecration, community of Zion Material equality and revolution
Outcome in Practice Mixed results; some collapse Historically, state abuse, shortages

 

 

Posted in All

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *