Highlights & Commentary on Robert B. Spencer’s Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam & The Crusades
Quotes on Islam
Bertrand Russel:
“Bolshevism combines the characteristics of the French Revolution with those of the rise of Islam. Marx has taught that Communism is fatally predestined to come about; this produces a state of mind not unlike that of the early successors of Mahommet. Among religions, Bolshevism is to be reckoned with Mohammedanism rather than with Christianity or Buddhism. Christianity and Buddhism are primarily personal religions, with mystical doctrines and a love of contemplation. Mohammedanism and Bolshevism are practical, social, unspiritual, concerned to win the empire of this world.”
John Wesley:
“Ever since the religion of Islam appeared in the world, the espousers of it…have been as wolves and tigers to all other nations, rending and tearing all that fell into their merciless paws, and grinding them with their iron teeth; that numberless cities are raised from the foundation, and only their name remaining; that many countries, which were once as the garden of God, are now a desolate wilderness; and that so many once numerous and powerful nations are vanished from the earth! Such was, and is at this day, the rage, the fury, the revenge, of these destroyers of human kind.” (from The Doctrine of Original Sin, Works (1841), ix. 205)
Alexis de Tocqueville:
“I studied the Quran a great deal. I came away from that study with the conviction that by and large there have been few religions in the world as deadly to men as that of Muhammad. As far as I can see, it is the principal cause of the decadence so visible today in the Muslim world and, though less absurd than the polytheism of old, its social and political tendencies are in my opinion more to be feared, and I therefore regard it as a form of decadence rather than a form of progress in relation to paganism itself.”
Winston Churchill:
“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property—either as a child, a wife, or a concubine—must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die. But the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytising faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science—the science against which it had vainly struggled—the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.”
John Quincy Adams:
In the seventh century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab of the lineage of Hagar [i.e., Muhammad], the Egyptian, combining the powers of transcendent genius, with the preternatural energy of a fanatic, and the fraudulent spirit of an impostor, proclaimed himself as a messenger from Heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth. Adopting from the sublime conception of the Mosaic law, the doctrine of one omnipotent God; he connected indissolubly with it, the audacious falsehood, that he was himself his prophet and apostle. Adopting from the new Revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life, and of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust by adapting all the rewards and sanctions of his religion to the gratification of the sexual passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. THE ESSENCE OF HIS DOCTRINE WAS VIOLENCE AND LUST: TO EXALT THE BRUTAL OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE…. Between these two religions, thus contrasted in their characters, a war of twelve hundred years has already raged. The war is yet flagrant…While the merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false prophet shall furnish motives to human action, there can never be peace upon earth, and good will towards men.” (Emphasis in the original)”
Demeaning Quran Verses on Women
Women inferior to men, to be ruled by men (4:34).
Woman like a field for man to use as he wishes (2:223).
Woman’s testimony worth half of a man’s (2:282).
Son’s inheritance is twice that of a daughter’s (4:11).
Husbands to beat disobedient wives (4:34).
Jesus vs Mohammad
“Blessed are you when men revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account. Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven.” Jesus, Matthew 5:11
Vs
“And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution is worse than slaughter.” Mohammad, Qur’an 2:191
—
“Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.” Jesus (Matthew 5:44)
Vs
“Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into the hearts of the enemies, of Allah and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know.” Muhammad, Qur’an 8:60”
Books Suggested by Chapter
Part 1: Islam
Ch. 1 Muhammad: Prophet of War
- The Life of Muhammad: A Translation of Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah by A. Guillaume, Oxford University of press 1955. It is an English translation of the earliest biography of Muhammad written by a pious Muslim and refutes the myth of peaceful Muhammad.
Ch. 2 The Qur’an: Book of War
- The Koran, English translation by N.J. Dawood, Penguin. A clear accurate translation. For more accurate but harder to read English translations by Muslims see those by Abdullah Yusuf Ali and Mohammed Marmaduke Pickthall.
Ch. 3 Islam: Religion of War
- An Introduction to Islamic Law by Joseph Schacht, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1982. Unbiased unlike today’s universities. It says, “The basis of the Islamic attitude towards unbelievers is the law of war; they must be either converted or subjugated or killed.”
Ch. 4 Islam: Religion of Intolerance
- The Dhimmi: Jews and Christian under Islam, 1985, by Bat Ye’or, Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
- The Decline of Eastern Christianity Under Islam: From Jihad to Dhimmitude 1996, by Bat Ye’or, Fairleigh Dickinson University Press
- Islam and Dhimmitude: Where Civilizations Collide, 2001, by Bat Ye’or, Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
(Writings of Bat Ye’or are full of primary source documents showing the harshness of dhimmitude.)
Ch. 5 Islam Oppresses Women
- Voices Behind the Veil: The World of Islam Through the Eyes of Women, edited by Ergun Mehmet Caner; Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 2004.
Ch. 6 Islamic Law: Lie, Steal, and Kill
- Umdat al-Salik, translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller into English as Reliance of the Traveller: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law: Amana Publications, 1994. It’s a guide to Muslim law, verified by Islamic authorities.
Ch. 7 How Allah Killed Science
- The Rise of Early Modern Science: Islam, China and the West, by Toby E. Huff: Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 2nd edition, 2003. This book explains why science developed in the West and not in China or the Islamic world.
Ch. 8 The Lure of Islamic Paradise
- Islamikaze: Manifestations of Islamic Martyrology by Raphael Israeli; London: Frank Cass Publishers, 2003. About what motivates suicide bombers.
Ch. 9 Islam Spread by the Sword
- Jihad in the West: Muslim Conquests from the 7th to the 21st Centuries by Paul Fregosi; New York: Prometheus books, 1998.
- The New Concise History of the Crusades by Thomas F. Madden; Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2005.
Part 2: The Crusades
Ch. 10 Why the Crusades Were Called
Ch. 11 The Crusade: Myth and Reality
- The Crusades: The World’s Debate by Hilaire Belloc; 1937, republished by tan books 1992.
Ch. 12 What the Crusades Accomplished and What They Didn’t
- Hatred’s Kingdom by Dore Gold; Washington, DC: Regnery, 2003. About the history of the violent wahhabi sect in Saudi Arabia.
Ch. 13 What If the Crusades Had Never Happened
- The Monks of Kublai Khan Emperor of China, or The History of the Life and Travels of Raban Sama, Envoy and Plenipotentiary of the Mongol Khans to the Kings of Europe, and Marcos Who As Mar Yahbh-Allaha III Became Patriarch of the Nestorian Church in Asia, (a long title,) translated by Sir E. A. Wallace Budge. Published 1928 in London. Out of print but the Assyrian international news agency made it available online at http://www.aiana.org/books/mok/mokk.htm #c72. About persecutions destroying Christianity in central Asia etc. about an emissary of the Mongols who tried to get European kingdoms to join against the Muslims with them. Well researched.
Ch. 14 Islam and Christianity: Equivalent Traditions?
- How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization by Thomas E. Woods, Jr.; Washington, DC: Regnery, 2005. This book does a good job of showing that not all religious traditions are equal and celebrates the many contributions of the church from the first hospitals and universities etc.
Part 3: Today’s Jihad
Ch. 15 The Jihad Continues
- Milestones by Sayyid Qutb; Mother Mosque Foundation, n.d.
Ch. 16 “Islamophobia” and Today’s Ideological Jihad
- The Raft of Muhammad by Jean-Pierre Peroncel-Hugoz; St. Paul, MN: Paragon House, 1988. About prejudice against non-Muslims, and about westerners trying to paint a (false) rosy picture of Islam.
Ch. 17 Criticizing Islam May be Hazardous to Your Health
- 23 Years: A Study of the Prophetic Career of Muhammad by ‘Ali Dashti; Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda publishers, 1994. About the moral defects of the Quran, the violence of Muhammad, etc. The author was imprisoned tortured and murdered for writing this book.
Ch. 18 The Crusade We Must Fight Today
- Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington by Paul Sperry; Nashville, TN: Nelson current, 2005.
Part 1: Islam
The wars of the Israelites were short-term and to specific people. This is unlike the Quran with hundreds of passages saying to kill all infidels everywhere.
You don’t see terror groups of Jews and Christians citing the few New testament and Old testament passages that could be interpreted as violent, but you see lots of Islamic terrorist groups citing the Quran all the time calling for violence.
Jesus never went to battle, Muhammad went to battle repeatedly. Muhammad was a bloodthirsty prophet of war.
Jesus saying he came to bring not peace but a sword was clearly allegorical philosophical.
Jesus says turn the other cheek, Muhammad says the opposite.
It is taught openly in Islam today that jihad, the killing of non-believers, is the highest duty of a Muslim.
The Quran sanctions wife beating child marriage and temporary marriage (in other words prostitution). The Quran treats women as inherently inferior to men.
Islam requires four witnesses for rape.
Muhammad married a 6-year-old and consummated that marriage when the girls was 9 years old.
In Islam, a women’s word is worth only half a man’s word in court.
Islam allows for stealing and killing when it’s for the good of Islam.
Islam does not have the golden rule of doing good to everyone, treating them the way you want to be treated. Islam says you only have to treat fellow believers well, and everyone else is treated with suspicion, etc.
Islam has mixed views about homosexuality, sometimes promoting it as existing in paradise, and sometimes allowing it for leaders, etc.
Note: Christianity clearly rejects homosexuality in both the Old and New Testaments. End note.
Islam doesn’t allow music of any kind. What it claims to have invented in science and math was borrowed from elsewhere. Even it’s architecture was from elsewhere. What it did accomplish in these regards was typically from servants of Muslims who themselves were not Muslim.
There are some myths that Islamic Invaders were welcome in various areas. If that’s true, why did they need tons of troops everywhere to enforce Islam?
Islamic suicide bombers are motivated by the assurance of 72 virgins in the garden of Eden.
If you didn’t accept the Islamic Invaders, if you didn’t join Islam, you would have to commit to paying a tax to them (the duma) or be slaughtered.
Islam calls for cutting off the heads of military enemies.
Note: This might be a clue for the identity of the beast kingdom who beheads Christians who refuse to take the mark of the beast. End note.
Islamic soldiers pillaged villages and violated women.
They said they wouldn’t impose religion, but they certainly imposed Islamic law.
For places they conquered, Islam captured and sold their citizens as slaves.
People try to make Islam and Christianity equal but they are not. Christianity and Islam did not spread the same way. Not all religious traditions are equal. Islam is inherently much more violent.
Christians not only did not spread their religion by violence but they were killed by the Romans for becoming Christians.
Christianity uses priests and monks to convert people. Islam sends soldiers. The options offered by the Islamic soldiers were join Islam, pay a permanent tax, or death. Most of the converts to Islam are people who saw conversion as the easiest way to survive given the circumstances and threats. Yes the religion of Islam forbids conversion by force, but they have no problem forcing the social and political elements of their religion.
See the book Jihad in the West by Paul Fordosey, 1998.
Part 2: The Crusades
The Crusades were not unprovoked aggression toward Islam; they were based on centuries of aggression from Islam. Crusaders were simply recapturing Christian lands.
Note: See the YouTube Channel “Real Crusades History.” End note.
Islam had been killing people who convert to Christianity from Islam.
Islam destroyed Christian churches, burned crosses, forbid crosses from being displayed in Jerusalem, etc. Over 30,000 Christian churches were destroyed by Islam.
The Pope didn’t call for conversion or conquest.
Crusaders were often well-to-do, and they sacrificed much to go on the crusade. It was typical at this time for Christians to make a pilgrimage (religious journey) to the Holy Land, and if they were attacked by Muslims on the way, they would fight.
The crusades were not about converting Muslims; they were just about recapturing Christian lands and defending Christian pilgrims.
Later, there was a time when some Christians attempted to convert Muslims unsuccessfully.
Everyone, including Muslims, preferred to live in crusader realms as they were better managed and people were treated better. When Muslims captured an area, they made non-Muslims dress a certain way so they could be targeted. But when Muslims lived in Christian areas, they could dress however they wanted, etc., so they wouldn’t become an item of targeted discrimination.
See the book A New Concise History of The Crusades by Thomas F. Madden, 2005. It dispels many politically correct myths about the Crusades: why they were fought, who fought in them, etc.
Contrary to popular belief, the Crusades were not early manifestations of colonialism in the Middle East.
The Crusader massacre of Jews and Muslims in 1099 was terrible, but it was nothing unusual for the rules of war at the time.
The Crusades were not called to Target Jews.
The crusaders did not set up European colonies in the Middle East. The general policy was to turn lands back over to who they belonged to before the Muslims had conquered them. There were some occasions where the crusaders didn’t have the support they needed, and they did have to set up a few states, but these could not be described as colonies. Colonies are lands ruled by far-off powers. These places were not ruled by far-off leaders, and the wealth of those areas was not siphoned off and sent to European rulers. They had no economic relationships with Europe. These were only established to make permanent safe places for Christian pilgrims in the Holy Land. These crusaders living in the East saw themselves as easterners. Another element of colonies is that streams of immigrants come to live in them, this also did not happen with Crusade establishments.
The crusaders’ attack on Jerusalem was not unique. And the death toll in this event has been dramatically increased by stories over time.
More than being a time of the beginning of a great feud between Islam and Christianity, the Crusades are the beginning of a time of great complaining against the West.
Note: Evil people will forgive you for being wrong, but never forgive you for being right. Today Christianity is cheap and fluffy, without the power to save. Only real Biblical Christianity can save the world, and that means no tolerance of evil. End note.
There’s a general principle of war at that time that if a city resisted being sieged, it could be sacked, and if it didn’t resist, mercy would be shown. Many Jews and Islamic people were allowed to leave the city.
The ankle- or knee-deep blood was clearly an embellishment. Such Rivers were not remotely possible – there weren’t that many people in Jerusalem. Muslim armies behaved the same way when they entered into a conquered city. This doesn’t excuse the behavior but it does show that it’s consistent with behavior of the time.
Jihadists frequently boast of their conquest and slaughter of Christians.
Muslim warrior general Saladin was not the benevolent person people make him out to be. He ordered the mass execution of his Christian opponents by beheading, in accordance with the Quran’s instruction on how to deal with unbelievers on the battlefield, rather than taking them prisoner.
Politically correct President Bill Clinton points to the crusader siege of Jerusalem as the reason we were bombed on 9/11.
Note: Bashing on Christians is always politically correct. Christians are the only group that isn’t to be tolerated in the religion of woke tolerance. As Raymond Ibrahim points out, Christians are the most persecuted minority worldwide. If you haven’t heard of this, you’ve only been watching mainstream news – it’s not popular to cover it. End note.
People forget about all of the terrorist attacks done by everyone except for white Christians.
It’s a fact that Christianity teaches a higher moral standard than Islam.
Attacking Jews was not the mission that the Pope gave the crusaders. Unfortunately, some crusaders became distracted and killed Jews.
Muslims treated the Jews and Christians badly.
Jews preferred living in Christian lands to Muslim lands since the treatment by the Muslims was worse.
Jesus called for his followers to be merciful and to be good to those that aren’t good to you. The Quran tells the opposite message, to only be good to fellow believers.
Muslims matched and exceeded the brutality of crusaders on many occasions.
The only time we see a Muslim military leader being good to the people they conquered was when it was convenient to do so.
See the book The Crusades: The World’s Debate by Hilaire Belloc. 1937 republished 1992.
Pope John Paul II is said to have apologized for the Crusades, but in reality he just apologized for some of the bad things that went on at that time.
After the Crusades, Muslims resumed their attempts to capture Europe by jihad.
Alliances with jihad forces are not smart. The policy of Islam is to only enter a truce when you’re too weak to win to give you more time until you can fight again. Agreements with Muslims are considered temporary things that only stay in place so long as it benefits the Muslims. You can’t negotiate with Muslims because their doctrine is jihad, and they will always be determined to do this.
Note: Different strict commitments are required of Christians. They are to stand as witnesses for God in all places. You can’t invite a Christian to speak and tell him not to witness of Christ. It can’t be done. Henry B. Eyring tells a heroic story of an occasion where he was invited to speak at a large event but was told not to testify of Christ there. He knew what he had to do. He went and testified of Christ anyway. Moral of the story – don’t expect a Christian to be anything other than a Christian, and don’t expect a Muslim to be anything other than a Muslim. End note.
Jesus said the hour is coming when people will kill you and think they are doing the will of God (John 16:2).
Note: Remember, Islam began some 600 years after Christianity, and certainly is one of the great fulfillments of this prophecy. End note.
The Sunnis are a more peaceful branch of Islam, but they have plenty of jihad in their past.
See the book Hatred’s Kingdom by Dory Gold. 2003.
Though the Crusades failed in their primary objective, they played a key role in staving off jihadist conquest of Europe. During the era of the crusades Islam’s spread by conquest dropped off significantly. Major conquests of Islam happened before the Crusades, and after the last Crusade strongholds were gone. When the Muslims conquer places those they conquered become a tiny minority and diminished. Only the people who have resisted jihad have not been wiped out, like Christian Europe and Hindu India.
Note: There may not be a Europe if it weren’t for the Crusades. Nor an America for that matter. End note.
Islamic distaste for non-believers is a constant theme of their history.
Note: Dennis Prager did a good job showing similarities between Leftism and Islamism – both are focused on destroying Christianity, western civilization, America, and freedom. On the other hand, the prime directive of Christians is to convert by word and example, not by sword or government dictation. End note.
Christians believe in a good god with a coherent will. Muslims believe in a god so supremely powerful that he is incoherent and inconsistent.
See the book The Monks of Kublai Khan, Emperor of China, or The History, Life, and Travels of Raban Soma (detailing the 13th-century journey of two Nestorian Christian monks, Rabban Bar Sauma and Markos, from Mongol-ruled China toward Jerusalem and Europe). This book is out of print, and politically correct academics want to make sure it stays that way.
Aina.org/books…. Get link from book. Also available at https://archive.org/details/BudgeMonksKublai.
Dhimmitude, or being ruled by Muslims, was not just a little bit of discrimination. There were numerous trifling dress restrictions; trade was dramatically limited; schools weren’t allowed; and Muslim tax collectors were allowed to treat the people however they wanted, often beating them. Conversion to Islam was often the only way people conquered by Muslims could hope to have a decent life.
Zoroastrians were so persecuted by the Muslims that today there are almost none of them. If it weren’t for the Crusades, the same probably would have happened to Christianity.
Dignity and rights for all people grew out of Christianity. These principles conflict with Islamic law in numerous ways. Were it not for the Crusades, there would probably be no human rights in Europe or the Americas today.
The Quran calls unbelievers the vilest of creatures. (See Surah 98:6 for example.)
Muslims believe that non-Muslims are on the same inferior level as pigs and feces.
The Crusades are what allowed Europe to flourish, keeping it from having to just focus on meeting basic needs, allowing art and music to thrive.
To this day, Christians are heavily persecuted in Islamic areas. Jesus said his followers will be persecuted but if they endure to the end they will be saved.
The Quran says there’s eternal hatred between believers and non-believers.
Most depictions of the crusades today are politicized non-historical nonsense.
It is not historically accurate to say that the Muslims wanted to coexist with non-Muslims before the crusaders arrived. The only coexistence they were interested in was the relationship of oppressor and oppressed with the dhimmi system.
The movie ‘The Kingdom of Heaven’ promotes the false agenda that Christians are the extremists and Muslims are peacemakers. It depicts the Christians as barbarians and the Muslims as sophisticated. It claims there was an alliance between Christians, Muslims, and Jews, but that never happened. Historians point out that this movie is pure fabrication. The Knights Templar are portrayed as villains. This narrative is only sustainable from the perspective of the Muslims.
Islamism and Bolshevism are irreligious social agendas. On the other hand, Christianity and Buddhism are personal, reflective religions.
The problem in the world today is not religious fundamentalism, it is Islamic jihad. We will not be able to resist jihad without recovering pride in Western civilization. Not all fundamentalisms are equal. You don’t see Christians flying planes into buildings they don’t like. The frequency of violent attacks committed by a religion are tied to the teachings of that religion. Christian terrorists McVay and Rudolph did not attempt to justify their actions by reference to Christian scripture. They were not acting on mainstream Christian teachings. There are not large Christian groups around the world dedicated to their terrorist ways. On the other hand, Muslims do have religious texts calling for violence they do have terrorist groups around the world. Muslims do have terrorists sighting their scriptures to justify their Acts. It’s inevitable that you’re going to see more violent Acts from Muslims.
When one of Jesus’s followers used the sword to strike off the ear of a soldier, Jesus told him to stop and heal the soldier’s ear. Compare this to Islam, where they cut off people’s hands and feet that they didn’t like.
Of course, not all Muslims are the problem, but the Muslim religion is in fact the problem. We must be honest and admit that Islam promotes global jihad. They believe it is their responsibility before God to wage war against non-Muslims and impose Islamic law first on Muslim states then on non-Muslim States.
The politically correct world cannot accept the corruption inherent in Islam because they can’t blame brown people of being wrong – everything has to be white people’s problem. Our schools and universities have taught for decades anti-white anti-western anti-colonial messages.
Politically correct people insist that all religions are the same, but this is not true. Islam is inherently more violent than Christianity. Christianity is at the heart of Western Civilization and has formed who we are as Americans.
People who are ashamed of their culture will not defend it. This is why we need to set the record straight or we will lose western civilization and be taken over by jihad.
See the book ‘How the Catholic church built Western Civilization’ by Thomas E. Woods Jr 2005. This book puts to rest the notion that all religions are equivalent.
Islam has not reformed or changed its doctrines of jihad warfare. Modern-day jihad groups are working to restore the caliphate to further their war with the West. These groups despised democracy as being at odds with the caliphate and Sharia law.
John Wesley said of Islam that they were like tigers destroying everything they came in contact with. That they are destroyers of humankind. That they destroy lovely places.
Prominent Muslim advocates say the sword is the key to peace and repeat the basic Islamic teaching that they are not a religion of peace.
Muslims reject the entire concept of human rights as a Judeo-Christian invention. Islam doesn’t like that Iran signed a declaration of human Rights.
90% of Muslims support Hamas, a terrorist group that blows up things to accomplish their agenda.
See the book Milestones by Syyid Qutb.
Muslims must wage war all over the world until Islamic law reigns supreme.
Groups today try to portray people who tell the truth about Islam as promoting hate speech. They made a new word to intimidate people from talking against Islam called islamophobia.
Muslims do not denounce jihad.
It’s popular to focus on offended Muslims and ignore the rights of the people the Muslims keep attacking.
Islam doesn’t recognize the human right to change your religion. Blasphemy is a capital punishment in Islam, a sin punishable by death.
Note: In ancient times, offenders of serious crimes in Israel had the option to flee and escape the death penalty (if you want to live like a pagan, go live with the pagans). Today Islam is unique in their punishments, and indeed, far surpasses ancient Israel in their brutality. The Torah talks about possible death sentences as more of an extreme measure that could be taken in cases of high and infectious rebellion, but rarely was. For more on this see Cleon Skousen’s ‘The Majesty of God’s Law’. See also productions by ‘Inspiring Philosophy’. End note.
The United Nations dishonors victims of Islamic terror by downplaying those terrorist events. All this political correctness and accusations of hate speech stops people from talking about these real problems. It stops them from getting an actual sources of jihad terror and stopping violence.
If it’s Islamophobic to point to the Quran to demonstrate passages that call for violence, then Islamic terrorists themselves are also Islamophobic because they do this.
It’s a fact that jihad and dimitude are parts of Islam.
Not all Muslims would themselves commit a terrorist act, but many of them approve of these acts. Only few of them disapprove of these acts, and fewer still openly advocate against these acts. And hardly anyone at all makes the argument from Islamic texts that these violent acts are not okay.
Remember Islam has declared jihad against America. For some reason, they say it’s Islamophobic to point this out and not be okay with it.
Jesus said love your enemies. Muhammad in the Quran said don’t be friends with unbelievers.
Islamophobia is a weapon being used by jihadists to shift the focus away from their terrorism. When suspected Islamic terrorists are arrested they simply blame it on Islamophobia.
The real danger is not the occasional person complaining about islam, it’s the structured mainstream message of Islam promoting jihad terrorism.
There’s a fake idea going around that true Islam is tolerant and pluralistic but true Islam looks like Saddam Hussein.
There’s a strange claim that the Muslim religion liberated women. Even if pagan societies treated women poorly, did that improve in Islam? No. Islam is famous for mistreating women.
There are moderate Muslims, but Islam itself is not moderate.
People think they have to defend Islam at all costs even if it means twisting the truth. They refuse to face the elements of Islam that jihad terrorist used to justify their Acts.
Moderate Islamic apologists try to claim that everybody else is wrong and they are right when it comes to what Islam is.
The FBI is now routinely saying that terrorist acts are not terrorist acts. Refusing to acknowledge Islamic terror. Even when they find posters of Saddam Hussein, the beheadings and a room full of explosives, no that’s not Islamic terror. Even when multiple bombs go off at the same time etc. they refused to call it terror. When Muslim men shot up a van of kids, the FBI just called it road rage.
Two shooters were labeled by the FBI as an angry white man, it turned out they were two black men, and one of them had changed his last name to Mohammed when he converted to Islam, but the news reporting did not reveal that his name was Muhammad. They ignored that he called himself a servant of Allah and was talking about jihad.
Many cases are reported which are clearly Islamic terrorist attacks, which the FBI repeatedly finds ways to blame on anything but Islam.
Mayor Rudy Giuliani sidestepped one of these Islamic terrorist attacks, saying it wasn’t really targeted against a certain group of people, claiming that the shooter was just mad at a lot of people.
A Jew and a Muslim were friends. As the Muslim became more committed to Islam the Jew broke off their friendship. Then the Muslim slit the throat of the Jew and went to a mosque. This is traditional Islamic assassination, yet the authorities refused to see the connection between the assassination and the race and religion of the victim.
Authorities called Muslims killing Jews not Islamic terror, but depression.
In 1999 A copilot who crashed a plane into a building said over and over “I rely on Allah.” The authorities refused to call this Islamic terrorism.
Whatever their motivations, American authorities are keeping Americans in the dark about the true nature of the threat of Islamic terror.
See the book The Wrath of Muhammad by Jean-Pierre Péroncel-Hugoz 1988 shows how westerners exchange fact for fantasy in their attempt to glorify Islam.
An Australian state has outlawed speaking negatively about Islam. Other places are considering this law too.
Converts from Islam to Christianity must live in fear, even in the United States.
An US Islamic organization called The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) goes around suing everyone for Islamophobia. They have unlimited funds to silence critics. Members of this organization have been arrested for terrorism and are openly in support of the terrorist group Hamas.
People who point out violent passages in the Quran are being prosecuted for religious vilification. This is a strange denial of the truth.
The Quran calls women fields to be plowed, objects to be treated as the man wishes, and encourages domestic violence. Husbands are told to beat their disobedient wives.
In the Quran, amputation is prescribed for theft (for example, see Surah 5:28).
Note: The Bible doesn’t prescribe amputation for theft. It prescribes restitution. End note.
In one court case, someone tried reading the Quran aloud, including verses vilifying women; the lawyer defending Islam stopped him and said reading the Quran aloud is offensive. If we can’t even discuss what the Quran teaches in public, that puts Islam beyond public criticism. We need to consider the implications of the beliefs of people we bring into the country. Indeed, the highest allegiance of a Muslim is to the Quran. To criticize is not to incite.
One Muslim shot, stabbed, and slit the throat of someone and tied a note to them with verses of the Quran. The authorities claimed that we don’t know anything about the motives of the assassin. It was a killing on the street in Amsterdam, killing a man named Theo van Gogh who made a movie which the Muslim did not approve of.
The book (P.I.G. Islam & Crusades by Spencer) goes over many cases where Muslims kill people for blaspheming.
Jesus said if people don’t receive you, shake the dust off your feet as you leave their house. Compare this to the Quran, which says to kill people if they leave Islam.
American converts from Islam to Christianity often must speak with false names in fear of being attacked by jihad.
See the book ‘Twenty Three Years: A Study of the Prophetic Career of Muhammad’ by Ali Dashti, 1994. He was killed for writing it.
Christians are not crusading anymore, but Islam is still doing jihad.
Europe has devolved from a Judeo-Christian civilization with enlightened secular elements into a civilization of dhimmitude that could be called ‘Eurabia’.
America is fighting against terrorism, but the European Union is working with the Arab League.
We must recognize that we are already in a war between two vastly different ideas of how to govern states and order societies. In this struggle, the West has nothing to apologize for, and much to defend.
The struggle against Sharia law is a conquest for human rights. Human rights is a concept that originated in the West and are denied by Islam.
Note: Human rights are a religious doctrine, not a scientific discovery. End note.
You can’t fight a war against terror, terror is a method. You have to identify who is using that method and fight them. After 9/11 George Bush said you’re either with the terrorists or you’re with us – but the White House continually refuses to acknowledge who the terrorists are and why they are fighting. In the light of George Bush’s statement that you’re either with the terrorists or you’re with us, why is the US still friends with many states that do jihad?
We should ask when and how will American policy defeat the goals and tactics of jihadists. This question is never asked. America must finally state its goals and interests regarding jihad. We should only support countries which denounce jihad and which refuse to make citizens of people who support jihad.
You can’t just denounce terror, you have to stop jihad. We must acknowledge that we are up against the worldwide jihad. Call upon states to renounce Sharia law’s jihad.
We need to decrease our dependence on Saudis for energy so we can have leverage to push for them to stop Muslim jihad.
Jesus taught us to do to others what we want done to us, but Muslims reject this (the Golden Rule) and teach to only respect fellow believers in Islam.
Every preacher of the Crusades was required to have read the Quran. If they were going to fight Muslims, they needed to know what the Muslim faith is, what their mind is. Yet in today’s society, when you call for increasing awareness about the Quran, people label you as racist and hateful.
Islamic terrorists are quoting from the Quran, yet they say that reading the Quran is a crime, and that learning more about the minds of the terrorists is not okay.
Responsible citizens should be informed about the Quran, honestly report about it, and law enforcement should be honest about jihadist attacks in the United States.
Any Muslim group in America that does not explicitly denounce Sharia law by word and deed should be labeled as a political group, not a religious group, and be subject to the scrutiny that we put on political groups.
It’s time to say enough, it’s time to stop being ashamed of Western Civilization that has given us human rights and amazing technology etc. Western children should know their history and be proud of it and grateful for it. Western children are not the children of oppressors, their families and homes are worth defending against those who want to take them. You might call it a crusade.
See the book ‘Infiltration: how Muslim Spies and Subversives have Penetrated Washington’ by Paul Sperry, 2005. He shows how Muslims with clear ties to jihad terrorists are deep in our political and military establishments.
